contact us

Use the form on the right to contact us.

You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right.


123 Street Avenue, City Town, 99999

(123) 555-6789


You can set your address, phone number, email and site description in the settings tab.
Link to read me page with more information.


[Event] Penn Blockchain Conference 2019

JL Law

Our Co-founder, Jor Law, will be speaking along with Charlie Lee (Creator of Litecoin), Ari Paul (CIO, BlockTower Capital), Albert Wenger (Partner, Union Square Ventures), Lane Rettig (Developer, Ethereum Foundation), Jalak Jobanputra (Managing Partner, Future Perfect Ventures), Leeor Shimron (CEO, NovaBlock Capital), Kathleen Breitman (Cofounder, Tezos), and many more world-class speakers!

Read More

[Event] Crypto Invest Summit 2019

JL Law

Join us as our Co-founder moderates the The State Of Digital Securities 2019 panel at Crypto Invest Summit.

CRYPTO INVEST SUMMIT is an exclusive, curated, high-impact, informative and thought-provoking summit presented by some of the world’s foremost innovators, change makers and prominent leaders in the blockchain and crypto ecosystem. For a full agenda please click here. Learn from, and network with the most influential people in the industry.

Read More


JL Law

Joint us April 8th, 2018 at the preeminent digital securities industry event - Security Token Summit in Los Angeles. Our Co-founder, Jor Law, will be doing a Fireside Chat during the Lunch hour.

Read More

Security Token Offerings: STOs Replacing ICOs?

JL Law

Based on a strong legacy of investor protection and oversight by regulators, security token offerings (STOs) are poised to overtake initial coin offerings (ICOs) that were conducted without regard to regulations. Understanding why and how this shift is happening is key to positioning your company to attract investors while protecting it from risk.

Grayscale Photo Membership ID Card.png

Understanding the Difference Between STOs and ICOs

With an initial coin offering (ICO), companies receive investor funding in exchange for cryptocurrency tokens. Most of these were done out of compliance with regulations.  Investors buy into these offerings in hopes that those tokens will increase in value, at which point, they can be traded for a profit. This is a classic example of a securities offering, which is supposed to be regulated, but ICOs were conducted largely as if they were unregulated.  While they offer a lot in the way of convenience and speed, ICOs were also a prime area for fraud when bad actors created ICOs with the intent to take the money and defraud the investors.  Even the good actors of ICOs often broke securities laws because they mistakenly thought that ICOs were unregulated.

A security token offering, or STO, is also a type of cryptocurrency token, but one that recognizes that the tokens or the token offering is regulated by securities laws. STOs can either be tokens that were sold as securities but is often thought of as relating to tokens that give their owners a share of the business profits, a stake in the business itself, or some other offering that is based on the business or asset itself. Because STOs are securities, they are regulated by the securities laws and the applicable securities regulators. These factors make it far less likely that investors will encounter fraud. The reality is that almost all ICOs were actually just illegal STOs, a notion that the SEC has often stated.

STOs, Regulation D, and Accredited Investor Verification

As the market moves away from ICOs as a means of raising capital, companies who have previously relied on this method may find that itis more work to operate within the regulatory framework of an STO. That being said, that very framework is what provides more public and investor trust in your business, so it is ultimately worth the effort.

STOs may rely on many different securities exemptions to conduct a sale, but it’s most often done in reliance on the Rule 506(c) exemption with a Form D filed with the SEC. These types of offerings may solicit anyone, but can only sell to accredited investors. For Rule 506(c) offerings, STO issuers are required to take reasonable steps to verify that investors are accredited investors.

Investor verification is vital to the success of a project involving an STO. Failing to properly verify your investors may result in serious consequences, as non-compliance may result in the SEC requiring the issuer to return all the investors’ monies as well as face potential legal actions.

To learn more, visit us at

Vote on Proposal to Extend “Test-the-Waters” Accommodation

JL Law

More types of issuers may soon have more flexibility when considering new securities offerings, as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has voted to propose expanding “test-the-waters” accommodation to all issuers including investment companies.

If the proposal goes ahead, all issuers will be able to gauge market interest in initial public offerings and other proposed registered securities offerings, by corresponding with potential investors in person or in writing before publicly announcing the offering. Under the current rules, only companies that qualify as emerging growth companies, or EGCs, have access to the test-the-waters" accommodation. Companies with more than $1 billion in annual revenues would generally not qualify as EGCs.

“Opening up this provision to more issuers is a move designed to enhance issuers’ ability to conduct successful public securities offerings and lower the cost of capital”, said SEC chairman Jay Clayton, who added, “The proposed rules would allow companies to more effectively consult with investors and better identify information that is important to them in advance of a public offering.”

Regulation D, Rule 506(c) and “Test-the-WatersAccommodation

If your organization is considering a new offering, understanding how this proposal and Regulation D, Rule 506(c) intersect is important.

Regulation D, Rule 506(c) allows companies to publicly solicit for funds and advertise while still conducting a private offering without registration with the SEC. Under Regulation D, Rule 506(c), companies can solicit and advertise their offerings, without registration, provided that all the investors in the offering are accredited investors and - most critically - the company has taken reasonable steps to verify their investors are accredited investors during the purchasing stage. Information like tax returns, brokerage statements, and lawyer or accountant certifications can be used to verify accreditation. The services we offer at provides issuers with the protection of SEC compliant safe harbor Rule 506(c) accredited investor verifications without the extra work on their end.

Under the proposed expanded “test-the-waters” accommodation, during the solicitation or offering stage, issuers will still be required to ensure that they are communicating with potential investors that they reasonably believe to be qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors. However, unlike rule 506(c), the new “test-the-waters” accommodation is designed for registered offerings. Any potential investor solicited has to meet those requirements so that they are assumed financially sophisticated enough to handle the communications. Notably, the SEC has not proposed a verification standard or requirement for ensuring that an investor has the right status, instead opting to allow issuers to rely on the methods they currently use to establish a reasonable belief. This, they say, is intended to give issuers more flexibility in choosing effective and appropriate methods for each offering and each investor.


The dominant provider of accredited investor verification services

Understanding Your Obligations as an Issuer

Using is the best way to ensure that your investors are accredited for your Rule 506(c) offering as we provide licensed attorney verification reviews for every accredited investor verification. Note that failing to properly verify your investors may result in serious consequences, as non-compliance may result in the SEC requiring the issuer to return all the investors’ monies as well as face potential legal actions. 

The SEC proposal is subject to a 60-day comment period after appearing in the Federal Register, meaning that it is one step closer to becoming a reality. Being able to “test-the-waters” could result in a greater number of 506(c) offerings if issuers elect to generally solicit investors rather than going through a registered offering. Whether the expanded accommodation becomes a permanent fixture of the investing world, or if the SEC decides to keep the current accommodation, this move indicates the agency’s willingness to adapt regulations to fit the real-time needs of the market.

Regardless of the outcome, Rule 506(c) will continue to represent an attractive option for issuers seeking to avoid the expense and scrutiny involved in a public offering. can help give your organization the peace of mind you need to connect with potential investors without jeopardizing your future success.

To learn more about verifying potential investors, simply reach out to our team at


JL Law

First official episode, Alon Goren talks to Jor Law, Head of Issuance at tZero and founder of Verify Investor, Kinsey Cronin, VP of BizDev at PrimeTrust and Andrew Dix, the founder of Crowdfund Insider.  The panel discusses the path from Crowdfunding to Tokenized Securities and everything in between.


Read More

[Webinar] Security Token-based Commercial Real Estate (CRE) investment

JL Law

An equity raise of the property in late summer / early fall 2018 brought in $18 million with a cap rate of about 5.8 percent. This was executed in conjunction with a regulated Security Token using Reg D – 506 (c). It’s one of the first cases of tokenizing a commercial real estate property.

Read More

Happy Holidays 2018

JL Law

Happy Holidays from the Team!

Read More

Securities Exchange Commission: Insider Trading Charges Against NFL Linebacker & Investment Banker

JL Law

Insider trading is pertinent to the world of crowdfunding and security token offerings as well.While these industries are still developing, insider trading happens, often accidentally and innocently.Nevertheless, it’s important for companies and investors to start thinking about how insider trading rules might impact their actions and policies.

Read More

Recent Changes to SEC Leadership

JL Law

In July, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) made several leadership changes in the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) and in the Clearance and Settlement Examination Program (CSEP). SEC announced the changes below in separate press releases issued in July, 2018.  It’ll remain to be seen how this news will affect crowdfunding, blockchain, exempt securities, and accredited investor verification.

Read More